Supreme Court Case Romer v. Evans - 1501 Words

In the 1996 Supreme Court case Romer v. Evans, the voters of the state of Colorado approved a second amendment to their state Constitution through a referendum, in order to prevent homosexuals from becoming a protected minority. Before the referendum occurred, many of the major cities in Colorado passed laws prohibiting people to be discriminated against based on their sexuality, including whether or not they are homosexual. The citizens of Colorado who disapprove of homosexuality then created a petition to put the second amendment to a vote, and won with a majority of 53% of the votes. Richard Evans, with the support of many others, took the amendment to court claiming it was unconstitutional, and should be removed from the constitution,†¦show more content†¦Because they did not makes these laws however, the amendment is valid, and should be considered constitutional. Additionally, there is a general law in Colorado that bans discrimination in general, and includes the prot ection for homosexuals, that would not be affected by the amendment. Furthermore, Scalia believes Kennedy’s argument is invalid because he does not use enough legal citation to provide evidence for his views, therefore the amendment should be allowed in Colorado. Although Scalia does not hold the majority opinion of the court, he does bring up a valid argument, in which there is a law already that bans discrimination for the general public, which includes homosexuals. This notion is valid because it shows why homosexuals do not need a separate law that states there can be no discrimination of homosexuals. However, this brings up the question as to whether or not there is need for an amendment that states there can be no laws that ban the discrimination of homosexuals, where the only group that is specifically affected is the homosexual community. This then, is a flaw in his argument, because if there is a law that bans discrimination in general, then there is no need to creat e more laws that specifically say there can be no discrimination ofShow MoreRelatedHistory And Personality Of The Supreme Court1155 Words   |  5 Pagesthe Supreme Court has also been affected by continual topics in recurrent cases as well as recurring constitutional themes. These continually topics are seen in previous cases that have made reappearances in other cases as they are applied to modern times and cases. As seen in the provision of the historic rulings in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education and the 1964 Reynolds v. Sims that established the rule of â€Å"one person, one vote† and equal protection played a large role in the 1996 case of RomerRead MoreThe Fight For Equal Marriage1292 Words   |  6 Pagesgreat length. Although this topic only brought to attention of the Supreme Court in 2015, gay marriage has long been a topic of interest in American society. Prior to 2015, gay marriage was only acknowledged and legal in select states, not nationwide. This caused great distress and heartache. One case in particular, the case that was brought to the supreme court, is very representative of such dejection. The subjects of such case are James Obergefell and John Arthur of Ohio. In 2013, the two wereRead MoreDepartment Of Agriculture V. Moreno Essay1462 Words   |  6 Pages1. Department of Agriculture v. Moreno (1973) Moreno is the earliest example of a toothier rational basis review that allowed the court to examine legislative history in order to determine the legislature’s actual purpose. An amendment to the Food Stamp Act of 1964 excluded households containing unrelated members from participating in the federal food stamp program. This class was effectively denied federal food assistance. The District Court for the District of Columbia held that this classificationRead MoreThe United States Should Pass New Laws To Prevent Discrimination704 Words   |  3 Pagesfourteenth amendment and backed by many local, state, and federal civil laws. The courts have made it clear that the Equal protection Clause is to prevent discrimination on the grounds of gender, religion, and disability. Its also should prevent discrimination based on sexual orientation.The right to privacy and to be left alone is protected by the fourth, fifth, ninth, and fourteenth amendment. In 1973 the court case Roe v .wade the decision was made on the base that intimate relationships are personalRead MoreDo State Laws Prohibit Same Sex Marriage Violate The United States Constitution1444 Words   |  6 Pagesmarriage violate the United States Constitution? This is a question that will be presented before the United States Supreme Court. Four states with bans restricting marriage to a union between one man and one woman will be considered. The question at hand relies on the Court’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment in both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protections Clause; the Court will also have to consider the question of State’s rights and whether the State has a legitimate interest in denyingRead MoreNaked Preferences And The Constitution1427 Words   |  6 Pagespreference.† When naked preferences are prohibited, any government action must be justified by reference to some legitimate public value. Ensuring that government action avoids naked preferences an d upholds recognized public values is how the courts â€Å"prevent the danger of factional tyranny.† When a group is treated differently than another solely â€Å"because of a raw exercise of political power,† a naked preference is at work. Self-interested groups are thus prohibited from seeking to obtainRead MoreLaw And Social Change : The Hollow Hope Essay1962 Words   |  8 Pagesconcerning law and social change is that the courts are ineffective in creating significant social reforms. His main claim is that the courts are too weak to overcome their lack of constitutional rights, their apprehension to make unpopular rulings, and their lack of judicial enforcement powers (Rosenberg). In his view, Rosenberg assesses that under the right legal and social conditions these constraints can be overcome, but ultimately he concludes that the courts can only bring about the illusion of changeRead MoreChief Justice Earl Warren s Justice2166 Words   |  9 Pagesbut ended up being more liberal on the Supreme Court than anyone had every expected. He presided over some very signifi cant cases that will be discussed below. The three that will be discussed, perhaps the most important, are Brown V. Board of Education in 1954, Gideon V. Wainwright in 1963, and Miranda V. Arizona in 1966. Now don’t be misled, Chief Justice Earl Warren did a great deal in his career, and influenced very much, however, his most prominent cases that affected criminal justice and theRead MoreThe Universal Right to Family Essay1786 Words   |  8 Pagesstraight couple could do the same without complication). Although this concept directly contravenes the both Amendments 10 and 14 of the US Constitution, the Supreme Court has never directly addressed it partially because of the cultural volatility surrounding the debate on gay marriage. However, in their relaxed silence on DOMA, the Supreme Court tacitly condones hundreds of state statutes and state constitutional amendments that irreparably impair gay families everyday. For instance, DOMA curtailsRead MoreThe Against Gay Marriage : Racism Or Proverb1737 Words   |  7 Pagesrules. According to Baehr v. Mike, â€Å"this case is about marriage equality in the Hawaii’s supreme court. The Hawaiian court of law was the first to regulate discrimination against same-sex marriages. The trial court was to determine whether the state could defend the judgment. The trial judge excluded the state’s case and decided that rejecting same-sex matrimonial unions was unwarranted. The state petitioned despite the fact that other states support Hawaii’s high court as being the first successful